August 26, 2008
Tim Pawlenty will be McCain's running mate
Question of the Day
In other news, Nancy Pelosi has her own interpretation
August 12, 2008
A century old practive of finding a virgin girl to be serve as a living goddess...
August 9, 2008
June 8, 2008
Minneapolis Ordinance Restricts How Long Cars Can Idle
I doubt that most residents in Minneapolis are against the ordinance. If the city used global warming to justify euthanasia against the mentally handicapped, I'm sure they could get Minneapolis residents to go along with it, and support it.
June 6, 2008
Minnesota Last in African American High School Graduation Rate
May 1, 2008
March 29, 2008
Fitna movie
I guess LiveLeak.com had to remove the video due to threats to their staff.
Sick...
March 14, 2008
John Coleman, Founder of Weather Channel, Plans to Sue Al Gore
March 10, 2008
Must Read: "Feminism and the English Language" by David Gelernter
Though, I encourage everyone to read "Feminism and the English Language," which can be found in volume 013, issue 24 of the Weekly Standard, in its entirety, I must place this excerpt on my blog.
"The driver turns on his headlights" is not about a male or female person; it is about a driving person. But "the driver turns on her headlights" is a sentence about a female driver. Just as any competent reader listens to what he is reading, he pictures it too (if it can be pictured); hearing and imagining the written word are ingrained habits. A reader who had thought the topic was drivers is now faced by a specifically female driver, and naturally wonders why. What is the writer getting at? To distract your reader for political purposes, to trip him up merely to demonstrate your praiseworthy right-thinkingness, is a low trick.
White's comment: "If you think she is a handy substitute for he, try it and see what happens."
Sometimes a writer can avoid plastering his prose with feminist bumper-stickers and still not provoke the running dogs of the Establishment by diving into the plural whenever danger threatens. ("Drivers turn on their headlights.") White's comment:
Alternatively, put all controversial nouns in the plural and avoid the choice of sex altogether, and you may find your prose sounding general and diffuse as a result.
But the real problem goes deeper. Why should I worry about feminist ideology while I write? Why should I worry about anyone's ideology? Writing is a tricky business that requires one's whole concentration, as any professional will tell you; as no doubt you know anyway. Who can afford to allow a virtual feminist to elbow her way like a noisy drunk into that inner mental circle where all your faculties (such as they are) are laboring to produce decent prose? Bargaining over the next word, shaping each phrase, netting and vetting the countless images that drift through the mind like butterflies in a summer garden, mounting some and releasing others--and keeping the trajectory and target always in mind?
Throw the bum out.
February 8, 2008
Mark Steyn at CPAC
"Citizens should have a government, not the other way around."
-Ronald Reagan
Dubai
insane punishments.
February 6, 2008
February 5, 2008
Mccain still needs Huckabee to beat Romney
I can’t find WV polls to gauge, but Martha MacCallum claims Romney’s 41-33 win during the first round of balloting was a surprise. Huckabee won the caucus when McCain’s supporters were apparently told to throw their support to him and keep the state out of Mitt’s hands.
Unraveling the Ron Paul Myth
The Lone Star Times has the answer
We need a Candidate that can contrast the differences between Republicans and Democrates
But the add, in my opinion, does a great job illustrating one of the main problems with a Mccain nomination: that Mccain will not be able illustrate the contrasts between Democrats and Republicans as well as Romney will.
It's been said before that if Mccain is our nominee it will be a 'civil' and 'clean' campaign. Which is exactly what we don't want. I thought we'd wanted a candidate that will clearly draw distinctions between the two parties, not similarities.
A lack of contrast between the two nominees undoubtedly guarantee a democratic president come November.
One distinction comes to mind---where I think Mccain and the democrats have "gone to far" is the global warming myth--but first heres the Romney Ad
And....
Here's Romney in the last debate drawing an important "contrast" between himself and Mccain on global warming--using the facts. And as Romney says earlier in the debate: "facts are stubborn things"
February 4, 2008
"Facts are stubborn things"
Listen closely to the first 5 minutes. Romney seems to have all his facts straight when it comes to Mccain's voting record, he admits it's mostly conservative and then points out key legislation that does not align with conservative thought. Mccain stands by his record claiming he's the guy that "works across party lines, to get the job done"
But then Romney takes a cheap shot a Mccain: ("if you get endorsed by the New York times your probably not a conservative") Mccain is now clearly mad
What ensues is a list of Mccain accusations, all five of which were misleading if not flat out lies.
Romney calmly writes each one of them down and after Mccain's time is up one by one explains how they are lies. Mccain goes so far as to claim Mitt Romney's former lieutenant governor endorsed when him when actually endorsed Romney...
Romney eloquently concludes: "facts are stubborn things"

